par Vincent le 24/01/2004 23h11
"By 1970 I clearly understood that the best results from exercise were usually produced by only one set of each exercise. In 1986 I learned that only two weekly workouts were usually better than three weekly workouts. Now, 10 years later, in 1996, I know that only one weekly workout is required by most subjects, and that some people do better with a schedule of only one workout every two weeks, and that a few people do best on a schedule of one workout every three weeks."
Arthur Jones, Ironman, June 1996.
----------------
Ce que interprète BDJ de ce passage :
"I could be wrong, but that quote may be from the perspective of people using the MedX Lower Back machine, which I concur for reasons written about in the past (and which Arthur discussed in his rehab book). I don't think he meant a general weight training program since one of my last conversations with him did not disclose as much. He is of the opinion that two full body workouts a week is ideal for most people... one taken to failure, the other lighter and sub-failure (a pump workout, if you will, to promote recovery among other things)."
Brian D. Johnston
------------------- autre :
"Is AJ still of the opinion of one set per exercise? (I know he never espoused the one set per muscle or consolidation type training.)"
BDJ : "AJ was always a bit vague with exact details. From what I could gather, he still promotes one set per exercise, but to this day is not a big proponent of only one set per muscle."
Mais AJ propose de faire 8 exos 2x par semaine (en FB) : Full Squat, SDT-jt, Tractions, Dips, DM, Curl, Wrist-Curl, Mollets. On est il me semble très proche d'une série par muscle... à part pour biceps/avant bras. Moi je pense que AJ ne parlait pas de réhabilitation, d'ailleurs le FULL TEXT se trouve dans l'AJ collection et à priori ca ne parle pas de rehabiliation...
Gagner du muscle : Progressive Resistance
Perdre du gras : Input < Output
Strict Curl 1x58kg
Bakawa shinanakya naoranai
Les idiots ne guerrissent qu'en mourant.